Subject | Re: They may have to settle for an Android phone... |
From | Nashton |
Date | 03/18/2014 14:58 (03/18/2014 10:58) |
Message-ID | <lg9jdk$ikf$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Flint |
FlintYou should get your GF (BF?-who cares) to spend some more time with you.
On 3/17/2014 11:37 AM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan Baker
On 2014-03-17 13:35:52 +0000, Flint said:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/17/2014 3:27 AM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
On 2014-03-17 07:09:34 +0000, Flint said:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/17/2014 2:42 AM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
On 2014-03-17 06:41:03 +0000, Flint said:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/17/2014 2:09 AM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
On 2014-03-17 03:29:07 +0000, Flint said:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/16/2014 4:39 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan Baker
On 2014-03-16 18:36:20 +0000, Flint said:Flint
On 3/16/2014 11:11 AM, Puffin Killer wrote:Puffin KillerFlint
"Gary" wrote in message news:5325a015$0$40100$c3e8da3$26f9d57d@news.astraweb.com...
On 2014-03-14 21:14:21 +0000, Flint said:Gary
On 3/14/2014 2:11 PM, Alan Baker wrote:FlintGary
...but people really want iPhones. :-)
riiight. that's why I just picked up a Samsung Galaxy Note III on the verizon edge program and will be upgrading to an LG G3 phablet in a few months
The article was about emerging markets Flint.
but I wasn't responding to the article but rather to Ailin' bellyachers commentaryAlan BakerFlint
In what way?
alwin is having an alanheimers moment again and is begging for me to remind him what he said previously so he knows which way to backpedal again.
LOL
I asked you to explain your claim...
...but you choose not to.
I am unsurprised.
:-)
you're unsurprised? That's ok, in 5 minutes you're alanheimers will caause you to forget all about it agan....
I can't forget about what hasn't been given, Flint.
What commentary did I make?
"people really want iPhones"
Which isn't commentary, but a pretty direct restatement of what the article said:
"People want what they can't have. For many of those living in emerging markets, that's an iPhone."
So...
ok, so i0 t was a paraphrased restatement. Just because you didn't author the original comment, you think you can weasle out of the stupidity of you parroting the absurdity?
Your claim wasn't that you took issue with the article, but with my commentary of it.
Flint
Dance away weasle boy. LOL!