Subject | Re: They may have to settle for an Android phone... |
From | Alan Baker |
Date | 03/16/2014 06:50 (03/15/2014 22:50) |
Message-ID | <lg3e3c$uj9$1@news.datemas.de> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Flint |
FlintSold... ...or shippped?
On 3/15/2014 10:28 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
On 2014-03-16 02:25:03 +0000, Flint said:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/15/2014 10:07 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
On 2014-03-16 01:57:45 +0000, Flint said:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/14/2014 8:16 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
On 2014-03-14 21:14:21 +0000, Flint said:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/14/2014 2:11 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
...but people really want iPhones. :-)
riiight. that's why I just picked up a Samsung Galaxy Note III on the verizon edge program and will be upgrading to an LG G3 phablet in a few months
How does what YOU do change what people in emerging markets want?
if v 'emerging markets', you're simply referring to BRIC markets, perhaps you have point. BUT, this is the good ole US, and the success Samsung has had getting the phablet phone to take off simply refutes your blanket claim that people "really want iPhones."
And your purchase of a Galaxy NOTE proves that success exists, does it?
no, it simply proves that there is a market that values phones other than iphones.
It proves there's a market of ONE PERSON, Flint.
considerimg Samsung sold over 10,000,000 Note II's, and 15million Note III's, I suspect that market is a tad larger than just >one<.
Why are you arguing such an absurd position? Let me guess... your innate desire to argue is getting the better of you again,right?The inane position is presenting the fact that you bought a SINGLE phone to refute a survey of many people.