Google| Subject | Re: OT: A question for Sandman |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 08/03/2009 12:51 (08/03/2009 03:51) |
| Message-ID | <C69C0F27.3F8D1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (25m) |
Sandman stated in post mr-FF052F.12423703082009@News.Individual.NET on 8/3/09 3:42 AM:
SandmanI have repeatedly posted absolute proof of how you lied. Period. And you have admitted to being a liar. Why deny it now?
In article <C69C0823.3F8BF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:SandmanChance FurlongSnit
Sandman, you are beating a dead horse, it is obvious you cannot get through to Mr. Attention Whore.
Are you saying you are not aware of how Jonas Eklundh lied about his CSS and then freaked out over being called on it - to the point he is *still* lashing out years later with lies, accusations, dishonest snipping, etc?
That's exactly what he's saying. He is not aware of things you only made up and lied about. How could he? :)
-- [INSERT .SIG HERE]
08/03/2009-
