Sandman
In article <D29ECD22.67B46%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1376] Sandman posts his image over and over and over and over... trying to [1376] burn the image into your mind. But what account was that comments [1376] tied to.

Sandman
CASE: Defendant statement: "The comment is not from anyone in my family"

Defense exhibit: <none>

Prosecution statement: "The comment was made by your wife"

Prosecution exhibit: <>

Defendant statement: You offer no support for this claim

Defense exhibit: <none>

Prosecution statement validated by exhibit that has yet to be disproven by the defense, statement stands. The court rests.

Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 0 79 | lying/lie 1 209 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 7 | honest 0 29 run 0 5 | css 0 11 | tilde 0 0