Sandman
In article <D298A0A7.6747D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1169] Cyberstalking IS a serious crime. Carroll repeatedly contacts my [1169] employer, co-workers, family, clients (127), and more. He has [1169] admitted to at least some of this online, and others I have had [1169] clients (128) forward his emails to me.

Sandman
[X] Unsubstantiated accusations (http://tinyurl.com/pojrtxt)

Also ironic, coming from the guy that said this:

Snit 03/24/2004 11:33:18 PM <BC937435.46C8E%snit@nospam-cableone.net>

"Hmmmmm.... I wonder who would get the e-mail if I sent it to fred@wismold.com hey.... I could try steve@wismold.com or steve_mackay@wismold.com"

And:

Snit 04/14/2008 10:37:01 PM <C4290E7D.B3780%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

"In 2004 as a reply to Mackay's lies about an email he claimed to get from me I noted the company the *IP* address of his post came from and noted that it might make sense to alert that company"

Snit
[1171] I have no obligation to speak of my family at all - and with Carroll [1171] and Sandman cyberstalking me it is wise to be careful what I say.

Sandman
I agree that you should be careful about what you say, and seeing how the risk of you saying something incriminating about yourself, maybe you should be altogether quiet?

Snit
[1172] I never claimed she was not.

Sandman
Incorrect, as I have shown, proven and quoted:

Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."

That was a lie, of course, but it is you explicitly stating that she is not your wife.

Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 48 | lying/lie 129 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 6 | honest 17 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0