Google| Subject | Snit digest 159 / 2015-12-17 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2015-12-17 20:22 (2015-12-17 20:22) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-d96da3d960e25bb310d07642dbadb01f@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (10m) > Sandman Snit (2h & 41m) |
In article <D298508A.673C0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitQuite the contrary - YOU made a claim about a comment:
[1139] Sandman made claims about a comment.
Snit 12/15/2015 09:05:33 PM <D295C09D.67140%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
"The comment is not from anyone in my family..."
[1139] I challenged him to back his claims.First - quote the claims I made about that comment.
Secondly - quote your supposed "challenge" to those supposed claims.
If you fail to do either - this is yet another outright lie of yours.
He never did...I will back any claim I make when and if they are questioned. I don't make claims I can't support, as we all know.
[1139] not did he rescind them.No need when I can support them. All you have to do is challenge the claim and I will fully support it. I have to wonder why you are so afraid of challenging the claim.
[1144] Sandman will NEVER back his claims or keep his word.Translation: Sandman always supports his claims, so you Snit is afraid to challenge them because it will further expose his lie.
Sandman: 28 Snit: 0
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 44 | lying/lie 114 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 6 | honest 17 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0
-- Sandman
2015-12-15-
-
-
