Google| Subject | Snit digest 186 / 2015-12-21 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2015-12-21 16:56 (2015-12-21 16:56) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-4264c48ee0f0a88e397ba6df929466b5@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (6m) > Sandman |
In article <D29D602A.679BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitAnd you claimed a facebook account was removed:
[1332] You claimed I removed the comment
Sandman: What's the "other" FB account? Snit: The one linked in the article Sandman: Which FB account is that? Link, please. Snit: You made the unsupported claim *I* removed it. Sandman: I never claimed you removed a facebook account
[1332] - a claim you never supportedIncorrect, it was fully supported:
CASE: Defendant statement: "The comment is not from anyone in my family"
Defense exhibit: <none>
Prosecution statement: "The comment was made by your wife"
Prosecution exhibit: <
>Defendant statement: You offer no support for this claim
Defense exhibit: <none>
Statement supported, and thus far not disproven by the defense.
[1332] (nor took back, hence breaking your own word).What word?
[1333] And when faced with this you lie (196) and talk about removing a FB [1333] *account*.I see you still fail to link to this supposed FB account.
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 1 70 | lying/lie 6 201 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 6 | honest 0 28 run 0 5 | css 0 11 | tilde 0 0
-- Sandman
2015-12-15-
-
-
