Google| Subject | Snit digest 190 / 2015-12-22 |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2015-12-22 08:49 (2015-12-22 08:49) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-f6634b5edb8db39b07d3efc1380944b5@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Slimer (5h & 47m) > Sandman |
In article <D29DDC58.67A51%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
SnitNo, this is my claim:
[1359] That is your claim. Or part of it.
"The comment was made by your wife"
And this is my support:
<
>To compare, this is your claim:
"The comment is not from anyone in my family"
And here is your support:
<crickets>
As such, my claim has been supported, yours has not. Thus, my claim validity is full, yours is empty.
Sandman: 41 Snit: 0
Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 0 78 | lying/lie 3 208 | incest 0 2 sex 0 0 | honorable 0 7 | honest 0 29 run 0 5 | css 0 11 | tilde 0 0
-- Sandman
2015-12-15-
-
-
