Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit digest 186 / 2015-...

Sandman
SubjectRe: Snit digest 186 / 2015-12-21
FromSandman
Date2015-12-21 23:18 (2015-12-21 23:18)
Message-ID<sandman-9be1ba79cb3bda9f44566f3d8d198415@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (47m) > Sandman

In article <D29D70B5.679E6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1332] You claimed I removed the comment

Sandman
And you claimed a facebook account was removed:

Snit
Ah, with all your dishonest alterations of my comments and your circus-pushing snipping I admit you succeeded in leading to confusion and error. Well done with your trolling, I suppose. Here, let me clear things up:

You said I removed the post from the article - from whatever account it came from. This is yet another unsupported claim from you.

Do you claim your wife removed it? Otherwise, you did. It's just a logical assumption, since I can't see the conversation leading up to you asking her to do it.

With the post: There is no evidence one way or the other as to what account it came from

Yes there is - the evidence you so desperately want to ignore:

<>

Keep up the lying, Snit, it's what you do best.

And then there's the question you never answers:

What "other" FB account?

Why can't you answer it?

though you have insisted it came from a specific account and then say your claim is your support

No, I support my claim with evidence:

<>

If you want to keep getting responses you will have to tell NEW lies... just responding to your same repeated lies has gotten boring, even for me who clearly has AMAZING patience.

So why not stop posting? You keep posting and posting and posting and posting. I am the one that is actually ignoring your repetitive lies in your cut'n'paste posts, only responding to new text.

-- Sandman

Snit (47m) > Sandman