Skip to main content
news

Snit digest 141 / 2015-12-16

Sandman
SubjectSnit digest 141 / 2015-12-16
FromSandman
Date2015-12-16 08:22 (2015-12-16 08:22)
Message-ID<sandman-6024dd9dc12ae6db7bac024dcb686570@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSnit

In article <D295C18A.67146%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
[1045] You left out context... and hence by your own criteria are lying [1045] (82).

Incorrect, leaving out context can be misleading, but not a lie in itself. Forging context, as you have done twice recently, is lying.

[1045] And you broke your word by altering the subject line to troll [1045] (28), linking to your trolling (29) site, etc.

I have made no promises not to count your trolling. Another lie from you, fully quoted.

[1046] In other words, you are breaking your own word and otherwise lying [1046] (83).

A recent fully quoted lie from you:

Snit Re: Snit post-editing 12/10/2015 <D28F42B0.66A13%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

"Returning context you either accidently or purposely remove is not a lie, no matter how much you guys try to twist it."

Where you lied about returning context when what you in fact was doing was forging the context.

Snit's response: None. He can't counter it because he knows he lied. He cannot defend, offer an alternative explanation or anything like that.

Sandman: 26 Snit: 0

Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- troll 29 | lying/lie 83 | incest 2 sex 0 | honorable 2 | honest 5 run 5 | css 6 | tilde 0

-- Sandman