Skip to main content
news

Re: Snit post-editing

Snit
Google Google
SubjectRe: Snit post-editing
FromSnit
Date2015-12-12 21:14 (2015-12-12 13:14)
Message-ID<D291CE18.66D8B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (1h & 52m) > Snit
On 12/12/15, 12:58 PM, in article sandman-98285a7941003a15b060d81759bbb7af@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <D2919174.66D3D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

2013-12-12 | Steve Carroll | fretwizzen@gmail.com

Snit
There may be, but I would say it is from multiple people using TOR, not because this is all tied to Carroll in any way. Not saying they could not be him, but I do not think your above evidence is enough to say it has been shown it is him.

Sandman
Nothing above is from Steve Carroll, Snit.

Snit
I left above the relevant quote where you specifically note it is.

Sandman
Incorrect. As you know, that is not Steve Carrolls' email address. You are now being willfully deceitful.

Snit
You specifically noted it was Steve Carroll.

Sandman
Since it is the wrong email address, it is not Steve Carroll, as you well know.

A = A. Steve Carroll is Steve Carroll.

Snit
And the fact Carroll uses multiple email addresses does not change the fact it is him.

Sandman
[X] Unsubstantiated accusation.

Carroll sometimes claims one or both of his accounts are "forged" or "hacked", but even he has noted at times that it is one account or the other of his which he is claiming this about. Their is not "accusation" - while Carroll at times has denied he uses both accounts he has also made it clear he does.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM: ----- Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being, don't trust anything from it. -----

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM: ----- Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume anything that's coming from it was written by me. -----

Notice here he repeatedly specifies WHICH of his accounts he is claiming was hacked (which we can go into much more detail on - his whole story about being hacked was filled with absurd lies).

Lots more on this... but this is an idiotic side issue you are pushing.

A = A. Steve Carroll = Steve Carroll.

It does not matter what account he uses, he is the same person.

Snit
What is 100% predictable is you will lie to back Carroll.

And you prove me correct, below. You will just continue to lie to back Carroll. No amount of "debating" will stop you from lying.

But let us be very, very clear: it is trivial to point to your direct lies.

----- Steve Carroll has only ever posted with Comcast dynamic IP's from the Colorado area. -----

Not only is this clearly a lie, even if it was not you would have no way of knowing. You ARE lying to back Carroll.

Sandman
There is no lie, and no "backing" necessary. Steve Carroll has only ever posted with Comcast dynamic IP's from the Colorado area. Any scenario where one would want to make it seem like he change one letter of his email and also post with TOR proxies when using that slight change is doomed to fail based on pure logic.

Snit
You pretend to wish to seek truth

Sandman
When did I ever claim to "seek" the truth? Where am I supposedly searching for this somehow elusive truth? I only ever *speak* the truth, and I substantiate my claims thoroughly.

Snit
but you will lie.

Sandman
Never.

Snit
Why? Because you are breaking #1:

1) Not bring up long dead debates, INCLUDING trolling someone over being butthurt over them when you have been proved to be wrong.

Sandman
What supposed "long dead debate" did I "bring up", Michael?

You are trolling me BECAUSE of long dead debates you are butthurt over. It is that simple. You can deny it. You can pretend otherwise. But you will never give any alternative reason why you are lying and trolling me. This is 100% predictable. As such your denials are of NO value.

Snit
You troll me over being butthurt over long dead debates.

Sandman
Outright lie #8

If you can offer a better explanation for your lies and trolling, of which denial is NOT one, then I you might be able to push a case here. Otherwise you are just pushing a circus... and looking for even more attention.

-- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Google
Sandman (1h & 52m) > Snit