owl
Slimer <.m@nsn.s>wrote:

Slimer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256

On 2015-12-10 5:30 PM, Sheldon Corky wrote:

Sheldon Corky
Snit wrote:

Snit
On 12/10/15, 3:05 PM, in article dthgjd03.a3r@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

owl
Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org>wrote:

Barry H (Snit)
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:24:32 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:

owl
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>wrote:

Steve Carroll
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 1:23:54 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:

owl
The lying scumbag Snit responds to one of my posts and adds words to my post. Stop humping my leg you pathetic Assburger!

Message-ID: <D28F2200.669CB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advoc

Slimer
UHc/0P5QrUP8BQAJ

owl
I had not quoted anyone in that post, yet the lying Assburger Snitfeen Pathtik added all that crap above my post as if I had responded to a post of his.

This is another one of those famous "unquotable lies" of his.

Steve Carroll
WTF is he on now?! Meth?

owl
Now the lying tweeker is lying yet again, saying that my newsreader somehow "snipped context" from my own original post -- which was not a reply to any other post from which context could even have been snipped!

Barry H (Snit)
How so?

owl
My post was not a reply to any post. Fucktard added quoted material from another thread to my post as if I had quoted it in a reply.

This was my original post: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/

Slimer
Tc3uspv7BQAJ

owl
This was Snit's reply to that: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/

Slimer
0P5QrUP8BQAJ

Snit
What do you think I was begging Sandman for? Can you quote it?

Sheldon Corky
Of course he can't quote it. Fabricating data and quote mangling is a specialty of Sandman. Factual data seems to get obfuscated in all of the rush to judgement.

Slimer
Another Snit sock... *plonk*

owl
He has no shame.