Google| Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
| From | owl |
| Date | 2015-12-10 23:05 (2015-12-10 22:05) |
| Message-ID | <dthgjd03.a3r@rooftop.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Barry H (Snit) |
| Followups | Snit (11m) Steve Carroll (27m) > owl |
Barry H <barryum@linuxmail.org>wrote:
Barry H (Snit)My post was not a reply to any post. Fucktard added quoted material from another thread to my post as if I had quoted it in a reply.
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:24:32 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:owlBarry H (Snit)
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>wrote:Steve Carrollowl
On Thursday, December 10, 2015 at 1:23:54 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:owlSteve Carroll
The lying scumbag Snit responds to one of my posts and adds words to my post. Stop humping my leg you pathetic Assburger!
Message-ID: <D28F2200.669CB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/OseGBQy6UHc/0P5QrUP8BQAJ
I had not quoted anyone in that post, yet the lying Assburger Snitfeen Pathtik added all that crap above my post as if I had responded to a post of his.
This is another one of those famous "unquotable lies" of his.
WTF is he on now?! Meth?
Now the lying tweeker is lying yet again, saying that my newsreader somehow "snipped context" from my own original post -- which was not a reply to any other post from which context could even have been snipped!
How so?
This was my original post: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/OseGBQy6UHc/Tc3uspv7BQAJ
This was Snit's reply to that: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/OseGBQy6UHc/0P5QrUP8BQAJ
2015-12-10-
-
-
-
