Subject | Re: Snit digest 130 / 2015-12-13 |
From | Snit |
Date | 2015-12-13 18:44 (2015-12-13 10:44) |
Message-ID | <D292FC7F.66EA2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (9m) > Snit Snit (25m) |
SandmanAnother chance for you:
In article <D292EEB3.66E8B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[918] Just some of your unsupported claims:
[X] Ignoring evidence (http://tinyurl.com/nz5x39v)
<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/steve>
There you can see the two email addresses, how they have been used. As can clearly be seen, Steve Carroll only ever posts from a comcast IP, and the forgeries using the incorrect email address only ever posts from known TOR proxies.
Now it's your turn - to counter this proof and show that your claim is correct, by using substantiation - not interpretation of quotes from posts, by using solid evidence.
Either that, or retract it. Those are your choices. I am waiting.