Skip to main content
news

Re: Any Minolta/Sony users ...

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP?
FromEric Stevens
Date2014-04-18 02:32 (2014-04-18 12:32)
Message-ID<1ks0l95rbi4aec4scdaeo3pvujogrc59r1@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (39m) > Eric Stevens
PeterN (14h & 34m) > Eric Stevens

On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:15:50 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <2gi0l99msbj34q772pfa1jr8slbbdls2i0@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

PeterN
But since you like quick and dirty processing, why don't you use the many color curves in LAB. Ater all you can apply a curve into a channel in LAB and get far more precise results than you can in ACR.

nospam
i don't like working in lab and do not find any advantage whatsoever, both in results and workflow.

dan marguilis is one of the biggest proponents of the workflow, and after reading his book, i was very unimpressed. it all can be done in rgb just as easily and likely with better results because you skip two conversions (which are not lossless).

Eric Stevens
But doesn't the Adobe color engine work in Lab anyway?

nospam
internally, but that's not the same as making a conversion of the image twice.

What are the two conversions? --

Regards,

Eric Stevens