Google| Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
| From | Tony Cooper |
| Date | 2014-04-14 06:53 (2014-04-14 00:53) |
| Message-ID | <95qmk9hf7p164s1nvmmkvd6khjii362n60@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | Savageduck (31m) > Tony Cooper nospam (1h & 24m) |
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 00:00:00 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
nospamNo you didn't. That's a complete fabrication. What you would call a "lie". What you said was:
In article <gfmmk99mv381mh8j7l9gj5gacdc462oprs@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:Tony Coopernospam
If you think that the new Healing Brush features are a equal substitute for the Cloning Tool, then you evidently never understood how to use PS's Clone Tool effectively.
i never said it was equal. what i said is that it works quite well in most situations and in many cases, it's easier and more effective.
"so does adobe, which is why they included a clone tool in lightroom."
It is not a clone tool. It does not replicate what the clone tool is capable of. You have to dick around with it to get it to use the area you want it to use which makes it less effective. Useful for some things, but not as effective, and certainly not easier to use.
-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL
2014-04-05-
