Skip to main content
news

Re: Any Minolta/Sony users ...

Tony Cooper
SubjectRe: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP?
FromTony Cooper
Date2014-04-06 19:53 (2014-04-06 13:53)
Message-ID<mt43k994sc3o2a37bkh4te8hrt4ig8u278@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
FollowupsPeterN (4d, 5h & 46m)

On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 13:32:59 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <j5r2k9938ta7rk567flv9k7qpprkl4oe26@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:

Alan Browne
All that said, when you're serious about photography and raw you should seriously get away from Linux and The Gimp.

Bob
Why would you write this?

nospam
he wrote it because it's true.

Bob
So you're both saying that it's not possibile to produce good photos using Linux and Gimp?

Alan Browne
Not at all.

I'm saying that the OS' of choice are OS X and Windows and the core tool is Photoshop. And in the communities where they are used (professional photography and graphics arts) they are the expected base tools of the trade. Because of that, there is a lot more support. A lot more 3rd party software. A lot more knowledge.

Linux would be okay for such if Adobe released Photoshop for Linux. But they don't. (It's very low use generally for desktop environments and bare existence amongst photographers doesn't make for a good investment).

Tony Cooper
It seems that only Floyd has kept the original poster's question in mind. The poster didn't ask what OS or what software would be an improvement on what he has. He asked what can be done to work with what he has.

Floyd - presumably - did a good job in answering this. I say "presumably" because I use neither Linux nor Gimp and don't know how practical Floyd's response was.

It's too bad that questions like the original poster's get diverted into battles over OS and software with the same old points being rehashed over-and-over. Nothing new was brought up.

nospam
the goal is to get the task done in the most efficient way possible.

that might mean trying something new or it might not. the gimp is not the only solution out there. far from it. have an open mind, for a change.

if the gimp can do it, that's great, but if something else can do a better job, more easily and/or with less hassle, that's even better.

Tony Cooper
You'd think some people have just discovered that Photoshop is a good program and feel compelled to tell the world about it.

nospam
they did that 20 years ago.

today, everyone knows photoshop is excellent and the standard to which everything else is compared.

Yes, we know all of that. You've posted this so many times that you might as well set up a macro for it. You aren't informing anyone of anything new. It's just a thread extender.

It's not like anyone has ever come back and said "Gee! I didn't know that. I'll order some version of Photoshop immediately. Thanks for letting me know."

-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL

PeterN (4d, 5h & 46m)