Google| Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 2014-04-14 02:02 (2014-04-13 20:02) |
| Message-ID | <130420142002536751%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (2h & 7m) > nospam PeterN (2d, 23h & 28m) > nospam |
In article <e5nlk9hg9vuhoq3cnvuqvhs9jb359pn6q3@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:
again, this isn't about me. it has absolutely nothing to do with me no matter how hard you try to spin it that way. nor does it have anything to do with me insisting that people use it. none of that is true. use whatever the fuck you want. i'm just pointing out the advantages. you are welcome to not learn anything new.Tony CoopernospamTony CooperTony Coopernospam
Of course, all we have is your word for it for any claim.
feel free to refute whatever i say with proof, not insults. you can't, which is why you resort to insults.
The only way to provide proof is to see what you do with images. So, produce something to work with and I'll see about proof from there.
once again, this isn't about *me*, it's about the apps.
second of all, posting images doesn't prove anything one way or the other because the benefits of lightroom are outside of what you might see in an image. you would have no way of knowing whether someone spent 10 seconds or 10 hours on an image, no matter what software they used.
Exactly. That's why you don't know if a change to LR would leave someone all that extra time to do something else.
You're making all about you because - evidently - it's improved your previously ineffective workflow so you think everyone else must benefit by doing what you say you do.
lightroom was written to increase productivity of photographers by providing all of the common tasks photographers do in one place, without burdening them with stuff they'll rarely or never use (although there are ways to do those on the off chance they do).
it succeeds in doing that.
2014-04-05-
