Google| Subject | Re: OT: Scoring the contest |
| From | Wally |
| Date | 03/04/2007 06:34 (03/04/2007 06:34) |
| Message-ID | <C210892A.2BF81%wally@wally.world.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (21m) > Wally Snit (10h & 9m) > Wally |
On 4/3/07 1:34 AM, in article C20EF195.79F25%SNIT@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID, "Snit" <SNIT@CABLEONE.NET.lNVALID>wrote:
SnitI thought for one moment that you were going to apologize for your poor math skills Snit! when I attended school....79% was higher than 74%..not for you?
Clearly there has been a contest to see who is most obsessed with me... so I figured I would do the contestants a favor and rate them. I looked at the Google archive and found how many posts each of the following have posted to CSMA and how many of those posts they mentioned me. I looked only for "snit", so when then call me "snot" or "Michael" or otherwise try to be "clever" in their trolling it might not be counted... so be it.
Here were the scores (percentages rounded):
Adams: 1052/1080 = 97% Carroll: 3031/3050 = 99% Sandman: 4840/6580 = 74% Wally: 379/ 477 = 79%
Ok... it seems like Adams and Carroll are well ahead with Sandman and Wally trailing badly... but Sandman is the only one to have a website where he mentions me over 100 times (it changes, but currently at 144... GROSS!). <http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Acsma.sandman.net+snit+OR+glasser>
Sorry, Wally... seems like the rest of your co-trolls in the competition are ripping you to pieces.
So again you prove in the most unexpected way that what "seems" to you has nothing whatsoever to do with reality! Thank you! ;-)
Adams... well, you are close but Steve has you beaten... and Steve and Sandman, well, you each are "winners" in your obsession - you just display it different ways.
Congrats to all of you... now seek help. Please.
03/03/2007-
