Skip to main content
news

Re: Calumet files Chapter 7

Tony Cooper
SubjectRe: Calumet files Chapter 7
FromTony Cooper
Date2014-04-04 17:12 (2014-04-04 11:12)
Message-ID<lditj9hpargv32kq8j3fsrtd6degm5478h@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (16m)

On 4 Apr 2014 13:09:25 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <jiasj9p57r7jqiqci42h8lbkviopu1kvf0@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:

nospam
once again, there is no approval necessary to write and sell a photoshop plug-in and call it that, which is what a lot of companies do.

Tony Cooper
To paraphrase one of your favorite terms: no one has said that any approval is required to write a plug-in to used with an Adobe product.

Sandman
Only to "use with" Photoshop:

Tony Cooper 03/15/2014 03:13:30 PM <hgn8i9pp0requhve7bt09eubvstel0ig44@4ax.com>

"they can approve vendors as suppliers of plugins for Photoshop. The plugins on that page are evidently plugins that Adobe has approved for use with Photoshop."

Only - you have never been able to provide any support for the approval process from Adobe for plugins to be "used with" Photoshop.

You pointed to a process wherein Adobe approves to include the plug-in on their market place (titled "Photoshop Plug-ins" while none are authored by Adobe), but that failed to provide support for the claim that they approve the plugins "for use with Photoshop".

I offer expert testimony: nospam, your midget tag team buddy. He's posted several times that Adobe has approved certain plug-ins for the "showcase".

-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL

Sandman (16m)