Google| Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
| From | Scott Schuckert |
| Date | 2014-03-25 19:18 (2014-03-25 14:18) |
| Message-ID | <250320141418489022%not@aol.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (2h & 41m) > Scott Schuckert nospam (7d, 3h & 17m) |
In article <slrnlj3fer.v0p.mr@irc.sandman.net>, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanApples and oranges, if I may be so bold. Apple doesn't compete with anyone; no one but Apple (or it's very small number of authorized resellers, who are tightly price-controlled) sells Apple products.
I'm just not what "position" that's supposed to be, here? I mean, the points he posted above are just basic facts.
The first; "competitve doesn't mean below cost" is just a very truthful statement. One can be competitive without undercutting competitors, just look at Apple.
Back to the conversation, did you not understand the part of my prior post - based on many years in the industry - where I explained that selling below cost might not even match the price of some online sellers? With that in mind, I'll ask you the same as I asked the other guy - what's a competitive price? Match it? 5% more? 10%?
2014-03-13-
-
