Google| Subject | Re: Calumet files Chapter 7 |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 2014-04-04 02:32 (2014-04-04 13:32) |
| Message-ID | <i3vrj9dpe0eu24om4e9ocklmtqbhifik71@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (5h & 8m) > Eric Stevens |
On 31 Mar 2014 05:35:31 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
--- snip ---
I would address the point in only a slightly different way.Tony CooperSandman
If a subject is addressed, and an aspect of that subject is not included, that aspect can be said to be "ignored".
No, this is incorrect. It could be any of these:
1. Forgotten 2. Overlooked 3. Ignored 4. Missed
It could be any one of these:
1. Forgotten 2. Overlooked 3. Deliberately ignored. 4. Missed.
In any case, If a subject is addressed, and an aspect of that subject is not included, that aspect can be said to be "ignored". As the list indicates, that does not require that the aspect has been deliberately ignored. --
Regards,
Eric Stevens
2014-03-13-
-
