Google| Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
| From | David Flood |
| Date | 2002-04-17 19:16 (2002-04-17 18:16) |
| Message-ID | <a9kdpj$42mev$2@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | paulh |
| Followups | paulh (1h & 48m) |
"paulh" <paulh@fahncahn.com>wrote in message news:ifcrbuo5hkm7bgb5gg44ktuo3l8vl5gqki@4ax.com...
paulhown
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:37:33 +0100, "David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>wrote:David FloodSO what ratio needs to be aspired to for THIS then? Perhaps if the Loyalist Paramilitaries kill more 'combatants'
then you'llpaulhTamim
be happy to take them off the list of 'Terrorists'.. What a pathetic excuse to justify terrorism..
Partly I have to side with Russ. Every army, when in war, kills it's
ofshare of civilians.paulh
Usually when wearing a uniform of some sort and belonging to some sort
andrecognised government. Sneaking around in civilian clothes kinda changes things....David Flood
You do realise that your definition includes the American (and French,
FretilinRussian, and Irish) revolutionaries, the ANC, the French Maquis, the East Timorese Fretilin and many, many others?paulh
I don't count it when foreign forces have invaded your country (Maquis,
etc....).. buy yeah ..sure.. otherwise you can justify anything to beterrorist
or not.So - to pin you down on this exactly - if what you're fighting 'against' is a foreign power which has invaded (and colonised, in some cases) your country, then it's OK (can you see where I'm leading with this yet)?
D.
2002-04-17
