Skip to main content
news

Re: spreadsheet ergonomics

Snit
Google Google
SubjectRe: spreadsheet ergonomics
FromSnit
Date2017-04-10 00:40 (2017-04-09 15:40)
Message-ID<D5100657.9E085%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
Followsvallor
On 4/9/17, 3:01 PM, in article ekvpa1F7f5pU1@mid.individual.net, "vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org>wrote:

vallor
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:25:31 -0700, Snit wrote:

Snit
Would be different if I was mentioned 1.5% of the time someone was mentioned... but 1.5% of ALL words. I have to say that is just sick. Yeah, higher than I would have expected... unbelievable how much COLA is obsessed with me.

vallor
Don't flatter yourself.

I find it more creepy than flattering. Really... it is sick. Heck, based on the list my name shows up more than "Linux", "Free", "open", and "source". Heck, NONE of those even show up on the list at all!

Attributions (including those quoted) will contribute to that total far more than direct mentions do.

As will quotes of any thing else.

(And if he's tallying what appears in headers, it will include your own posts, too.)

And Peter's and maybe others. Really: look at Peter's headers -- more signs of the bizarre and creepy obsession COLA has with me.

And Carroll is right about one thing -- you are all over COLA threads like ants at a picnic.

And that is with me mostly just responding to when people bring me up. It is creepy and weird how much those of you who troll COLA obsess over me. Then again, the stalker you speak of is also the one who said this: ----- You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention -----

That just may be the dumbest thing ever written in COLA.

-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>