Google| Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 2017-04-05 17:59 (2017-04-05 08:59) |
| Message-ID | <D50A6288.9CE3D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (5h & 15m) > Snit |
On 4/5/17, 12:57 AM, in article sandman-1b6730e4792f5ab7f0bce73431199a0d@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanAh, so I am right about why you often refer to me without using my name. Figures. Also why Carroll and others who troll me do so... they are helping you fake your data on even who references whom.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D5091832.9CA35%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanWhat is the quantifiable measurement of my "obsession" this time? Can't be "responses" because you respond to me as much as I do to you. Can't be "mentions" because you mention me far more than I mention you.DFS
How are you counting 'mentions'?Do you count every 'Sandman' as a mention, or just one per post that has your name in it?Sandman
One per post.SnitDFSSandman
Do you count this post of yours as a Snit 'mention'? You didn't type 'Snit', but it's a reply to Snit, and his name is in the attribution
Then it's a response, not a mention. Your post would be a Snit mention.
What about when those who troll me refer to me with derogatory nicknames
Those would be irrelevant to this data,
Which, of course, I have noted for years.
since it shows how often you mention their names, i.e. how obsessed you are of the regulars in cola, not the other way around.Ah, that explains why when I post ZERO times for a month I am still the most commonly mentioned person. LOL!
Face it, your data is nonsense. How about using the trolling criteria from Google I pointed you to and showing how all the regulars, including you and I, rate.
But give how it will not back your biases you NEVER will. This is 100% predictable.
Look at Carroll and his "gluey" and the "he who shall not be named" and the "the thing" and more. Am I going to waste my time counting such instances just to have you lie... no. Why would I waste my time like that? I can, of course, point out future examples... just to see Marek whine I am copying and pasting replies.SnitSandman
as they do so often...
Got any data to support that claim? No? Figures.
Yeah, those of you who troll like to play with your databases of COLA in a bizarrely obsessive way, lie about what you find through twisted stats, and then whine when you are proved wrong.
Oh well. It is all part of the "fun" of COLA.
-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
2017-03-31-
-
-
