Marek Novotny
On 2017-04-03, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <D507DCE6.9C718%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
And then when I respond he snips

Sandman
Ironic, from the snip master himself: <http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snitsnip>

See, this is what is called "substantiation". You know, the thing you never provide.

Snit's response: Silence...

Snit
As far as you quoting my lies, interesting how you have no examples.

Sandman
Plenty of examples, from the last week alone, fully quoted:

<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snitquotes>

Marek Novotny
You've no idea what honesty is. You lie more than anyone here; more than anyone I have ever met.

Snit
But do so in unquotable ways. Riiiiight.

Sandman
I.e. fully quotable ways:

<http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snitquotes>

Snit
So to prove to me you are not obsessed with me

Sandman
Lie #1

No, to prove that you are lying.

Snit
you put more absurd accusations on your own site

Sandman
Lie #2

Verifiable substantiations, not "absurd accusations".

Snit
taking yet more of your trolling out of COLA for no reason other than to troll me and seed Google.

Sandman
Trust me, no one outside of cola cares about anything on that site. Either way, it's easier to format and display the data on the web, plus it automatically updates the more you lie.

Snit
Yeah, great evidence on your part!

Sandman
I know! Especially considering that it is 100% uncontested substantiation that you are lying.

Snit
Really it is just you spew tons of accusations with your automated tools you use to track your own trolling

Sandman
Lie #3

No such "tools" exist.

Snit
and then say I have to defend myself against them all or they should be assumed to be true.

Sandman
That's not how proof works. I make a claim and I provide substantiation for that claim. If you agree with the claim you need not do anything. If you disagree with the claim you need to provide counter support for your disagreement to by anything but hot air. You are free to provide only hot air (which is what you always do) but you know as much as I do that your hot air goes nowhere when it comes to counter the actual substantiation that I *always* provide for my claims.

Snit
Look at the first couple: you claim it is unsubstantiated that "you before I did...". Without the context who the hell knows what that even is in reference to.

Sandman
That's why there is a Message-ID and the context can be found easily by anyone.

Snit
Then "but who cares, we both failed" -- I think this is in reference to the challenge we both failed... you faster than I did. And that is just a fact as seen in COLA.

Sandman
Unsubstantiated claim #1

Snit
Heck, you trolled me, trying to get me to respond

Sandman
Unsubstantiated claim #2

Snit
and then said you were responding to my trolling which was not true but was you claiming to have failed the challenge to not respond to trolling.

Sandman
Unsubstantiated claim #3

See - this is what your "hot air" is when compared to my substantiation.

Snit
But read that sentence... your nonsense gets so convoluted there is no simple way to even explain it... you have lie upon lie about lie. A huge pile.

Sandman
Unsubstantiated claim #4

Marek Novotny
That's Snit... All talk... Nothing substantial.