Sandman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

In article <k1ccecdkarnd6go8sgi2l2g26vrofvdeag@4ax.com>, chrisv wrote:

Snit
Look at Carroll and his "gluey" and the "he who shall not be named" and the "the thing" and more.

Sandman
I can't "look" at anything because you provided no substantiation to look at. Only mere claims. So you have two claims that need support:

"What about when those who troll me refer to me with derogatory nicknames"

What "nicknames"?

"as they do so often..."

How often is that?

chrisv
Well, you must concede that the thing is sometimes mentioned, without using its name.

Sandman
Of course, but it's only relevant if it can be quantified. I.e. typing the word "it" or "the thing" is hard to measure. So a list of nicknames and how to measure them is a start.

chrisv
However, if the obsessed Carroll is excluded, those mentions are not very frequent, and would be quite rare, if the thing would only stop trolling (or, better yet, drop dead).

Sandman
Yes, the claim is "often", which to me sounds like it would add at least another 30-40% to the numbers, right? So that needs to be measured to be supported.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJY5ligAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRd2EIAJwJ5FTPnM7hE1fNCW/OfUHQ e0Cx57J9PYvKnuPO1SrVHapWVafqScNBMLgz/BQwJqHF49gmhi2etU/M87n85kVd 4dkUaOkxuZez+GTeWhhbWejAJT9ixn9NFNOZndQVNmEcvAs5wV6jD/bSRkC5Nogo 99hU4P6ajNLBQkhsnUUOooYPNBjfWxkvydwCaQlm/1FRcc2MHf/32axQZtehx1f8 NQZBPJtxkk4nIZYe/rDb6/3JJ2lD7wTbDLcWb3Ib0Vv2I80s5mw73LZ1JIVKVyCl RdsbBONCih5sONzXWFq+A1KWrw2paQ7vwZk1q4pADND9Zwnx2HP9KdLOG4ujZf0>=+2KU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----