Skip to main content
news

Re: Google Copying Apple......

Alan Baker
SubjectRe: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung
FromAlan Baker
Date2014-07-01 04:53 (2014-06-30 19:53)
Message-ID<lot7qn$p6d$1@news.datemas.de>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
FollowupsHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (1h & 16m) > Alan Baker

On 2014-07-01 02:41:05 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
On 6/30/2014 10:39 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

Apple Fan Not
On 2014-07-01 02:33:57 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 10:29 PM, Alan Baker wrote:

On 2014-07-01 02:24:36 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:

On 6/30/2014 9:34 PM, -hh wrote:

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:

-hh wrote:

As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.

Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as"

It can, but not when in the context of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.

circular argument.

Nope. Wrong again.

And your usage perfectly followed the fallacy as illustrated.

like hell it did...

It did precisely. In a nutshell:

"All phablets fit in pants pockets... ...except the Galaxy Note 8... ...but that's not a true phablet".

provide a cite where I >specifically< said ">ALL< phablets fit in pants pockets". I mean, generally phablets do, but i never quite said exactly that. NOTE: the 'generally' is just like you like to twist 'typically', and means there may be exceptions.

"Any phablets >designed< as such generally do fit in pockets however."

Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
I did say 'generally' meaning there may be exceptions, kinda like the way you like to twist 'typically'.

And the you engaged in the "no true Scotsman" fallacy.

Apple Fan Not
A few weasel word, but close enough.

The Galaxy Note 8 was designed as a phablet.

No reply?

You were supposed to supply some other criteria besides screen size that it didn't meet, but you punked out on that, too.