Google| Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 2014-07-01 04:29 (2014-06-30 19:29) |
| Message-ID | <lot6ee$mr9$1@news.datemas.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
| Followups | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy (4m) > Alan Baker |
On 2014-07-01 02:24:36 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:
Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyNope. Wrong again.
On 6/30/2014 9:34 PM, -hh wrote:Apple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy wrote:-hh wrote:It can, but not when in the context of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.As soon as 'Harry' used the word 'true' as a qualifier, the jig was up.Why is that? "True" can carry the context of "primarily designed as"
circular argument.
It did precisely. In a nutshell:Apple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
And your usage perfectly followed the fallacy as illustrated.
like hell it did...
"All phablets fit in pants pockets... ...except the Galaxy Note 8... ...but that's not a true phablet".
Apple Fan NotHarry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy
Wiggle wriggle...but you're still hooked; irrevocably so.
no I'm not....Apple Fan Not
-hh
2014-06-25-
