Google| Subject | Re: Google Copying Apple.....Almost as bad as Samsung |
| From | Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
| Date | 2014-07-01 04:29 (2014-06-30 22:29) |
| Message-ID | <lot6eb$b0m$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Alan Baker |
| Followups | Alan Baker (1m) > Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy |
On 6/30/2014 8:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
Alan Bakeryes you did. You're lying, shill.
On 2014-07-01 00:28:22 +0000, Harry Mudd the Anti-Fanboy said:Alan BakerApple Fan NotNot a dodge. You're evasion in asnswering my challenge is the actual dodge. This whole thing about what constitutes a phablet arose over you and KDT stubbornly constantly conflating phones with phablets.And now you've switched to another dodge.And dhow me ONE time where Apple refers to an ipad mini w/a VOIP app as a 'phablet'. Betchya can't....No, Fanboy: you don't get to define what terms in common usage mean.Actually, I do. It's *my* money and I can vote against them and reject them as phablets by not spending it on one of your tablet phones....No, Fanboy. You don't.no, but I do get to >reject< them as phablets....Sorry, but you appear to be saying that you get to decide what Samsung calls its products...And how did I exclude the Galaxy note 8? I said it was not aIf only because Samsung mistakenly coopted the term for aphablet<, not that it wasn't a phone.----- Well *you* can define it however you wish but every majors review site is calling it a phablet.tablet<of theirs....You not BUYING something is not rejecting them AS phablets.Yes it is.....
No, actually. It came from YOU claiming that all phablets could fit in pants pockets and the post declaring that any phablet that didn't wasn't a "true phablet".
Well, did you or did you not claim that?Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboySo therefore, I CHALLENGE you to provide a cite where Apple refers to an iPad mini w/a voip as a 'phablet' (or even specifically as a 'phone').Apple Fan Not
I never claimed the iPad is a phablet.
but you're defending it as a valid exception that qualifies it as a phablet.
No. I've not even mentioned the iPad.
Why do I always have to provide *you* refreshers on what *you* said....Mr. Alan-heimers.Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
This was what KDT specifically claimed and you chimed in in agreement way back a few threads ago.
Really?
Quote me.
"In this thread"? So that's your dodge! I'm talking a greater context which included previous discussions of this in preior threads... and no, I'm not going to waste my time digging them up just to satisfy your petulance.Harry Mudd the Anti-FanboyAlan Baker
Back up your assertion. or consider your petulance utterly destroyed...
Back up your claim I ever said a single thing in this thread about the iPad...
Hope you're having 'fun' wriggling around trying to weasle out of whatt you said previously.Alan BakerHarry Mudd the Anti-FanboyWhat? Got no hair on yer balls? Try plucking a few from your asshole, Anal, and gluing them on yer nuts...Apple Fan Not
And we've gone in to full dodge mode!
blah, blah, no true scotsman...blah, blah...'dodge' this, 'dodge 'that...blah, blah, blah...
Face it: you lost a long time ago.
I'm just having fun with you now.
:-)-- my favorite company is *anybody* BUT >Apple<!
2014-06-25-
