Google| Subject | Re: Paintshop and Corel |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 2013-12-01 00:05 (2013-12-01 12:05) |
| Message-ID | <8lrk99hvnscqrf0nmd3eammu1fct484cl0@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | J. Clarke |
| Followups | David Taylor (7h & 46m) |
On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 10:20:41 -0500, "J. Clarke" <jclarkeusenet@cox.net>wrote:
J. ClarkeIt doesn't need to be dedicated. Just as long as it is not subject to significant other use while Photoshop is running. --
In article <l7c5n9$epm$1@tota-refugium.de>, lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com says...Laszlo LebrunJ. Clarke
On 11/25/13 12:46 PM, YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle wrote:YouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlleLaszlo Lebrun
I was advocate for having a small very fast drive keep empty just for swap and temporary files.
Oh, you just reinvented Linux? ;-)
What does that practice have to do with Linux? One would do the same thing on an IBM 360, VAX, Windows box or any other machine with virtual memory. Photoshop has its own separate pagefile which for best performance should have another dedicated drive.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
2013-11-16-
