Subject | Re: Snit self-nukes AGAIN (was Re: Snit's obsession with Sandman is EXTREME!) |
From | GreyCloud |
Date | 02/20/2017 17:54 (02/20/2017 09:54) |
Message-ID | <o8f6te$j42$3@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Marek Novotny (24m) |
SnitYet another diversion. It seems you can't define obsession... you use it freely like a duck uses water.
On 2/20/17, 1:02 AM, in article sandman-47eb2a886757598a2764c413be1e8432@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanSnit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D4CF7E14.90A22%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SandmanSnitSandman
Jonas Eklundh asked for a better criteria to show his obsession (and the obsession of others). I selected his posts from the start of the year and show his obsession.
Diversion #1What I asked was what definition of "Obsession" and "Begging for attention" do you have that fit Greyclouds post that isn't just "he responded to me"?And for your diversion:select count(id) from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where email >>>>'mr@sandman.net' and date >'2017-01-01') and mytext like '%sandman%' and date >'2017-01-01'- ->151You've posted about me 151 times in posts not directed at me. So how did I do?select count(id) from sandman.usenet where email >>>>'mr@sandman.net' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and date >'2017- 01-01') and mytext like '%snit%' and date >'2017-01-01'- ->26So you self-nuked again. You just can't find a definition of "obsession" that won't fit you better than anyone else.SnitSandman
GreyCloud would see much the same: both of you have been posting mostly about me (or your fantasies of me) or just with insults about me for likely 90% of your posts or more. I would say even 50% would be sign of obsession.
select count(id) from sandman.usenet where email >>>>'mr@sandman.net' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and date >'2017- 01-01') and mytext not like '%snit%' and date >'2017-01-01'- ->60That's 60 posts where I am not responding to you nor talking about you. Do your own math :)Snit
Jonas Eklundh busted forging quotes
Lie #1
<https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY> ----- Jonas Eklundh busted forging quotes, changing the topic from PERCENT of posts ABOUT another person to COUNT of posts that MENTION another person by name, AND he whines about these videos which he has said he likes.
Sandman just tells lie after lie after lie. Proved again. -----Snitchanging the topic from PERCENT of posts ABOUT another person to COUNT of posts that MENTION another person by nameSandman
You're going to have to specify your criteria a little better here. You never said anything about "percentages".
<https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY> ----- Jonas Eklundh busted forging quotes, changing the topic from PERCENT of posts ABOUT another person to COUNT of posts that MENTION another person by name, AND he whines about these videos which he has said he likes.
Sandman just tells lie after lie after lie. Proved again. -----SandmanSnit
But the numbers are above, 26 is 43% of 60.
Since you specifically stated that "obsession" is *not* responding to a person (in spite of calling Greycloud obsessed after responding to you),
<https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ> ----- Jonas Eklundh continues his lie about mere responses being a sign of obsession as opposed to directly obsessing over someone, and he admits to fantasizing about my life. -----SandmanSnit
all my responses to you are not counted. But let's do the math for you, but spread it out for each poster, shall we? We have the technology! :)
Person | >| < | ! - ---------------------------------------------------------- Marek Novotny | 91 | 379 | 278 owl | 225 | 296 | 199 Peter K?hlmann | 81 | 159 | 92 Silver Slimer | 12 | 193 | 83 GreyCloud | 209 | 246 | 108 Melzzzzz | 11 | 49 | 24 John Gohde | 10 | 12 | 4 Sandman | 154 | 181 | 113 vallor | 46 | 118 | 86 - ---------------------------------------------------------- Total posts from Snit: 2574 Posts where Snit talks about people: 1807 (70%)
So, to recap, second column is how many times that person has responded to you, third column is how many times you have responded to that person, and the fourth column is how many times you have talked ABOUT that person in a post that is NOT a response to that person.
<https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc> ------ Jonas Eklundh asked for a better criteria to show his obsession (and the obsession of others). I selected his posts from the start of the year and show his obsession.
It is EXTREME! ------SandmanSnit
And then there is a summary of how many of your total posts that consists of you talking about a person that you're not responding to. That's 70% of all your posts.
So by your new metric, your biggest obsessions are clearly Marek, owl, me and Greycloud.
<https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc> ------ Jonas Eklundh asked for a better criteria to show his obsession (and the obsession of others). I selected his posts from the start of the year and show his obsession.
It is EXTREME! ------