Subject | Snit self-nukes AGAIN (was Re: Snit's obsession with Sandman is EXTREME!) |
From | Sandman |
Date | 02/20/2017 09:02 (02/20/2017 09:02) |
Message-ID | <sandman-47eb2a886757598a2764c413be1e8432@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
PGP | gpg: Signature made Mon Feb 20 09:02:29 2017 CET
gpg: using RSA key 2144C1F05A03E8D1
gpg: BAD signature from "Sandman |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Marek Novotny (6h & 24m) Snit (7h & 33m) > Sandman |
Lie #1SnitSandman
Jonas Eklundh asked for a better criteria to show his obsession (and the obsession of others). I selected his posts from the start of the year and show his obsession.
Diversion #1What I asked was what definition of "Obsession" and "Begging for attention" do you have that fit Greyclouds post that isn't just "he responded to me"?And for your diversion:select count(id) from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where email >>'mr@sandman.net' and date >'2017-01-01') and mytext like '%sandman%' and date >'2017-01-01'- ->151You've posted about me 151 times in posts not directed at me. So how did I do?select count(id) from sandman.usenet where email >>'mr@sandman.net' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and date >'2017- 01-01') and mytext like '%snit%' and date >'2017-01-01'- ->26So you self-nuked again. You just can't find a definition of "obsession" that won't fit you better than anyone else.SnitSandman
GreyCloud would see much the same: both of you have been posting mostly about me (or your fantasies of me) or just with insults about me for likely 90% of your posts or more. I would say even 50% would be sign of obsession.
select count(id) from sandman.usenet where email >>'mr@sandman.net' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and date >'2017- 01-01') and mytext not like '%snit%' and date >'2017-01-01'- ->60That's 60 posts where I am not responding to you nor talking about you. Do your own math :)Snit
Jonas Eklundh busted forging quotes
changing the topic from PERCENT of posts ABOUT another person to COUNT of posts that MENTION another person by nameYou're going to have to specify your criteria a little better here. You never said anything about "percentages". But the numbers are above, 26 is 43% of 60.