Sandman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

In article <D4CF5E23.909E2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
Jonas Eklundh asked for a better criteria to show his obsession (and the obsession of others). I selected his posts from the start of the year and show his obsession.

Sandman
Diversion #1

What I asked was what definition of "Obsession" and "Begging for attention" do you have that fit Greyclouds post that isn't just "he responded to me"?

And for your diversion:

select count(id) from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where email = 'mr@sandman.net' and date > '2017-01-01') and mytext like '%sandman%' and date >'2017-01-01'

- ->151

You've posted about me 151 times in posts not directed at me. So how did I do?

select count(id) from sandman.usenet where email = 'mr@sandman.net' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and date >'2017- 01-01') and mytext like '%snit%' and date >'2017-01-01'

- ->26

So you self-nuked again. You just can't find a definition of "obsession" that won't fit you better than anyone else.

Snit
GreyCloud would see much the same: both of you have been posting mostly about me (or your fantasies of me) or just with insults about me for likely 90% of your posts or more. I would say even 50% would be sign of obsession.

Sandman
select count(id) from sandman.usenet where email = 'mr@sandman.net' and ref not in(select mid from sandman.usenet where name = 'Snit' and date >'2017- 01-01') and mytext not like '%snit%' and date >'2017-01-01'

- ->60

That's 60 posts where I am not responding to you nor talking about you. Do your own math :)

Snit
In your case you also have your "antagonizing through other media" (by your own criteria) -- that shows even more of an obsession from you.

Sandman
Funny, coming from the guy that posts lies about me on youtube. :-D