Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 2006-07-07 00:27 (2006-07-06 15:27) |
| Message-ID | <C0D2DC4D.544BE%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (8h & 23m) > Snit |
"Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>stated in post mr-D58E52.21420306072006@individual.net on 7/6/06 12:42 PM:
SandmanBy all means, please support your accusation.
In article <C0D2B1B3.5445C%SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>, Snit <SNIT@CABLE0NE.NET.INVALID>wrote:SnitSandman
All that babbling from you and you *still* can't explain why Google "lost" the cache to your site.
Says the guy that thinks Google indexes all subdomains when it indexes one domain! :-D
Hey, Sandman! Those are some mighty fine running shoes!
<SNIP />
Don't worry about linking to other subdomains - Google finds them all automatically, through magic actually.Please support your claim. Oh wait, you are just sinking to the trollish tactic of speaking for me since you can find no flaw in what I actually write. OK. Pathetic.
<SNIP REASON="Sandman goes insane and talks to himself" />
Apart from that - when you snipped and ran from reality - you also ran from this, I want an answer to this:Please note: Sandman *still* has not explained why Google would "lose" the cache of his site.
Again, why did I remove it in this fantasy? What was my motive? I don't even remember why you're insisting I removed it. How does it help you in your troll?
As for your motive, Sandman, who cares why you lie so much. Maybe you are still pretending that I did not help you with your web design? Maybe the old design you found humiliating. Maybe you just cannot help yourself from being dishonest. Ask yourself your motive for being the lying troll you are; and if you do not know the answer go find a shrink.
-- ? As of Feb 2006 Apple had no wireless Mighty Mouse ? If A = B then B = A (known as the "symmetric property of equality") ? One can be guilty of a crime but neither tried nor convicted
2006-07-02-
