Snit
"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-B2D6ED.13581503072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/3/06 12:58 PM:

Steve Carroll
In article <15eqg.78203$x.391435@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com>wrote:

NRen2k5
Snit wrote:

Snit
"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-F37E26.11042503072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/3/06 10:04 AM:

Fair enough. Do you have a reference for the example you give?

NRen2k5
I can't find the one I read last night, but here's another: http://tinyurl.com/qq5t

The more I search the web, the more it seems that there's just no single consensus on pluralizing initialisms. :|

For example, you said that the "CDs", for example, is proper and that "CD's" is a modern trend, but Wikipedia tells me it's exactly the opposite.

Steve Carroll
Should be good enough for Snit as he has used this source repeatedly to make claims of his own (and we all know Snit is no hypocrite;) You should expect an apology from him at any time. LOL!

Snit
What do you think I owe him an apology for?

NRen2k5
I'm wondering too.

Steve Carroll
Realistically, not a thing... (no one really owes a troll anything) I was just holding Snit to the same standard he tries to hold everyone else.

Snit
Do you think your sidestep shuffle worked, Steve? You still have not explained why I would owe NRen2k5 an apology on this matter or why *anyone* would think I did.