Google| Subject | Re: Apple Ad debate |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 2006-07-03 21:58 (2006-07-03 13:58) |
| Message-ID | <noone-B2D6ED.13581503072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | NRen2k5 |
| Followups | Snit (46m) Snit (6h & 4m) > Steve Carroll Snit (7h & 18m) NRen2k5 (7h & 55m) Snit (1d, 2h & 4m) |
In article <15eqg.78203$x.391435@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com>wrote:
NRen2k5Realistically, not a thing... (no one really owes a troll anything) I was just holding Snit to the same standard he tries to hold everyone else.
Snit wrote:SnitNRen2k5
"Steve Carroll" <noone@nowhere.net>stated in post noone-F37E26.11042503072006@comcast.dca.giganews.com on 7/3/06 10:04 AM:SnitSteve CarrollFair enough. Do you have a reference for the example you give?NRen2k5
I can't find the one I read last night, but here's another: http://tinyurl.com/qq5t
The more I search the web, the more it seems that there's just no single consensus on pluralizing initialisms. :|
For example, you said that the "CDs", for example, is proper and that "CD's" is a modern trend, but Wikipedia tells me it's exactly the opposite.
Should be good enough for Snit as he has used this source repeatedly to make claims of his own (and we all know Snit is no hypocrite;) You should expect an apology from him at any time. LOL!
What do you think I owe him an apology for?
I'm wondering too.
You'd think they could at least learn from us how to engage in proper intellectual discourse.LOL!
-- "Heck, OS X is not even partially based on FreeBSD" - Snit "Sandman and Carroll are running around trying to crucify trolls like myself" - Snit
2006-07-02-
