Skip to main content
news

Re: The closest we'll get t...

Sandman
SubjectRe: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an error (was: ISO value names are becoming ridicul
FromSandman
Date2016-01-12 17:58 (2016-01-12 17:58)
Message-ID<sandman-a864874096e3535e8229847330fee5f9@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (10h & 14m) > Sandman
Whisky-dave (18h & 51m)

In article <120120161045111831%nospam@nospam.invalid>, nospam wrote:

Sandman
I've said it before - when proven wrong, nospam either snips the proof or quietly leaves the thread. He would never admit to being wrong, so this is as close as we'll ever get to him admitting to claiming that ISO is a logarithmic scale was an incorrect claim - he abandoned the thread. :-D

nospam
i have not abandoned the thread. replies are pending.

Hehe :-D

Sandman
The funnies part is all the energy he spent into making sarcastic remarks along the way, and when he realized he was 100% incorrect, he just left with his tail between his legs. :-D

nospam
i'm not 100% incorrect.

I am eager to read your reply to see you admit to making numerous incorrect statements, apologizing for your sarcastic and inflammatory remarks and pointing some minor detail you may have gotten correct in one message.

Chances are bigger that you'll deflect, ignore the topic and claim victory based on something incredibly minor that you did get correct which turns out wasn't even in contradiction to something I've said, all the while not acknowledging that you were incorrect and has been proven wrong. :-D

-- Sandman

nospam (10h & 14m) > Sandman
Whisky-dave (18h & 51m)