Subject | Re: Snit digest 67 / 2015-12-01 |
From | Slimer |
Date | 2015-12-01 20:47 (2015-12-01 14:47) |
Message-ID | <n3ktcn$gfp$2@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
PGP | Andrzej Matuch |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Snit (34m) Snit (36m) |
SandmanWe've all become too wise to his "debate" strategies so Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Heathen Guy is getting angry.
In article <D2832D8B.65AC9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
[563] Hint: when you post try to have meaningful content
I did, you ignored it.SnitSandman
[564] At this point you are just a bore...
So why are you responding? I thought you responded for your own amusement?SnitSandman
[565] Really, Sandman, move on.
From what? I was talking to you, asking sincere questions and you ignored my entire post. I assumed you did so for your own amusement?