Google| Subject | Re: Snit Socks Coming Out Of The Wood Work |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 2015-11-25 20:03 (2015-11-25 11:03) |
| Message-ID | <15c35548-549d-4e21-b782-66b240713b80@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Lloyd Parsons |
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 11:47:37 AM UTC-7, Lloyd Parsons wrote:
Lloyd ParsonsIf what you say is true then it wouldn't be an issue, would it? People could just killfile both of us and be done with it. Yet, Snit's BS persists. The reason is obvious but you don't want to take responsibility for it. People like you... responding to him (at all, on any topic other than his BS) let him feel like his BS is fine. Realistically, you're far more to blame for Snit's circus that I am, Lloyd.
On 2015-11-25 18:43:16 +0000, Steve Carroll said:Steve CarrollLloyd Parsons
On Wednesday, November 25, 2015 at 11:21:53 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:SnitSteve Carroll
On 11/25/15, 11:10 AM, in article n34tdk$a2t$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer" <.m@nsn.s>wrote:SlimerSnit
On 2015-11-25 12:54 PM, Edward Stansfield wrote:Edward Stansfield (Snit)Slimer
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:26:30 -0700, Snit wrote:
I I I I I I I I I I I I I É
Yep, pretty much.
Hey, YOU are the one who decided the topic you wanted to discuss was me. I simply noted where you were wrong about my views. To summarize my views:
1) Debate can be fun...
Honest debate can be fun, but what you do isn't honest.
<< lotsa Carroll's crap snipped>> And here's the other half of the never-ending Snit circus posting nothing that matters.
2015-11-25-
