Skip to main content
news

Re: post processing

Tony Cooper
Google Google
SubjectRe: post processing
FromTony Cooper
Date2014-03-17 14:56 (2014-03-17 09:56)
Message-ID<5vudi9p2uj5ae4ksfkd8ggbncp3fibr7kg@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (6m)
On 17 Mar 2014 13:37:29 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <itsdi9hpvo781ftb97i3od0qsckq9j0jhr@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:

So, are thesde your statements, then:

1. Only Adobe can make Photoshop plug-ins

Tony Cooper
Never said that.

nospam
you just did, above.

Tony Cooper
Evidently, your reading skills are not working today. Anyone can create a plug-in to be used with Photoshop. They cannot legitimately call it a "Photoshop Plug-in", though.

Sandman
You've made that stupid statement a couple of times now. I've been busy laughing at you - but I think it's time for you to actually, you know, substantiate it.

You claim that only Adobe can "call" a plug-in a "Photoshop plug-in" and we know that many developers call their plug-ins "Photoshop plug-in"

Yes, we do. Evidence of misuse doesn't change anything.

and we know that Adobe lists third party plugin's under the heading "Photoshop plug-in" so so far there is nothing out there in the real world that has yet to align to your claims.

You snipped the link to that page while posting other links. Why's that?

The Adobe Exchange page is published by Adobe. If Adobe wants to list vendors/programs that are approved by Adobe, that's up to them. They also stated on that page that the plug-ins were *for* Photoshop.

So, please tell us again how these people can't "call" their plugins the way they are already calling them, Tony.

Evidence of misuse doesn't change anything.

-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL

Google
Sandman (6m)