Skip to main content
news

Re: post processing

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: post processing
FromEric Stevens
Date2014-03-17 09:57 (2014-03-17 21:57)
Message-ID<n6edi9pn800ckqnoljlp4u6ncj0dn2g458@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsDavid Taylor
FollowupsYouDontNeedToKnowButItsNoëlle (19m) > Eric Stevens
Floyd L. Davidson (49m)

On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 06:55:53 +0000, David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid>wrote:

David Taylor
On 16/03/2014 19:50, Eric Stevens wrote: []

Eric Stevens
A more accurate interpretation might be that they use RAW images because of the scene's wide dynamic range.

I will use JPG for snapshots but not for images where I might want to print them to a reasonable size. In that case I prefer my own image massaging to whatever might be done by the camera.

David Taylor
It's both - you can plan on using RAW if you know that the scene /needs/ it, but the impression I get from reports here is that often it is the saviour of inappropriate exposure.

As printing needs here rarely exceed 30 cm (12 inches), and most images are for HD TV or Web display, my requirements are fortunately less stringent than yours. My Nikon and Sony cameras do a good job in-camera.

I'm exploring what I can do with A2 or thereabouts. :-) --

Regards,

Eric Stevens