Subject | Re: Snit post-editing |
From | Barry H (Snit) |
Date | 12/16/2015 15:01 (12/16/2015 09:01) |
Message-ID | <n4rqml$m9d$1@dont-email.me> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | |
Followups | Snit (2h & 4m) |
"linuxiac" <linuxiac@usa.com>wrote in message news:n4psrp$osu$1@dont-email.me...So it wasn't a lie after all but a misunderstanding that snit admitted to.linuxiacThe current weaseling from Snit is that after obsessively lying about it for days, even he was smart enough to "suddenly realize" his error and all those lies from him never happened.
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:20:15 -0700, Snit wrote:Snitlinuxiac
The response is either to give no quote, or give a quote and not show how it is a lie. Or sometimes point to an error I made, as Ezekiel did earlier today, and insist even though I openly admitted the error and it has been beaten to death, and Ezekiel was the one caught lying, to blame me.
More lies and obfuscation from you snit. Where did Ezekiel lie, specifically where did he lie and in context not your usual misquoting routine. He did not lie and you know it.
He did what he always does. He'll dishonestly misquote what people post and then lie and twist what was said.
It's no wonder that trolls and advocates alike hate his worthless guts in every newsgroup he posts in. The only "supporters" of his are nyms who's entire posting history is defending Snit through anonymous proxy servers.And your proof of this claim is?