Google| Subject | Re: Republicanism still an offence in England? (wasRe: Queen mother (of |
| From | David Flood |
| Date | 2002-04-17 19:24 (2002-04-17 18:24) |
| Message-ID | <a9ke72$42mda$2@ID-121201.news.dfncis.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.tolkien |
| Follows | paulh |
| Followups | paulh (1h & 39m) |
"paulh" <paulh@fahncahn.com>wrote in message news:btcrbusilqsjma1kmh3oqjom9i90ele6j9@4ax.com...
paulhthen
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 17:39:10 +0100, "David Flood" <NOSPAMmaoltuile@utvinternet.ie>wrote:of 'civilians' vs combatants.. SO what ratio needs to be aspired to forDavid Flood
THISpaulh
then? Perhaps if the Loyalist Paramilitaries kill more 'combatants'
considerDavid Flood
you'llpaulhDavid Flood
be happy to take them off the list of 'Terrorists'.. What a pathetic excuse to justify terrorism..
I guess it depends greatly on your personal point of view - who you
to beguerillas/revolutionaries/freedom fighters, and who terrorists.paulh
yes... there is always that. I'm sure some people find the IRA/INLA..ect
freedom fighters and some think the various UDA/UFF forces to also befreedom
fighters. I can only speak for my opinion that they are all terrorists...(And some would consider certain BA units which 'handle' the Loyalists to be undoubtedly terrorists, from what has emerged into public knowledge in the past decade)
To move this to a deeper level of debate - are they (the paramilitaries) the cause or merely the symptom of yet another bloody episode in British colonial history?
D.
2002-04-17
