Google| Subject | Re: Sandman still lying about his CSS |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 2017-02-10 20:25 (2017-02-10 11:25) |
| Message-ID | <34b165c5-3fb3-4465-a137-5003ab044fee@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
On Friday, February 10, 2017 at 12:01:30 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
SnitGee... I must have you confused with one of the 'other' Snits <eyeroll>.
On 2/10/17, 11:45 AM, in article p_-dnSTwc_TNlwPFnZ2dnUU7-KHNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>wrote:Marek NovotnySnit
On 2017-02-10, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>wrote:Steve Carroll
On Friday, February 10, 2017 at 10:18:53 AM UTC-7, Marek Novotny wrote:Marek NovotnySteve Carroll
On 2017-02-10, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:SnitMarek Novotny
Instead of arguing why not have your show and I will be a guest.
You'll never be a guest on my show, nor will anyone even mention you else I will edit it out. As far as I am concerned, you don't exist in the world of Linux I wish to discuss.
That's how I had read things. These 'my OS is better than your OS' discussions have long since played out, there's just no need to to cover this kind of material in what you mentioned you want to do.
Who would want that?
For once you actually did just fine in getting your 'point' across...SnitSteve Carroll
No question (as you can see by Snit's questions about you 'open-sourcing' the show) there will be a trolling faction that'll seek to destroy or, at least, tarnish what you're trying to do but that can be dealt with easily enough by blacklisting the idiots who try to push their BS onto your site's comment areas or forum area (a thing I think you'd probably want to have along with the blog).
Ah, Carroll thinks he is my spokesperson again.
-- Sure: I ask questions about how Linux serves desktop purposes better than the competition and that bothers you. I get it. And it is your show... you have no obligation to offer a well-rounded and honest look at Linux. You are free to offer a biased look or a look at other areas where that is not appropriate.
No harm feelings.
Curious: will you publish your show with an open license? Will others be able to post it, with commentary? --
LOL! That's the entire point, crackhead. No one with a working brain wants pot pissers, disingenuous whiners, clueless idiots and tantrum throwing cry-babies in a technical discussion.SnitSteve CarrollMarek Novotny
As you mentioned, you can post the videos to your site and leave them open for comments there, just close comments on YouTube where you probably want to host the videos files. You gain a 'face' to the public that you have complete control over where no one can successfully rape your content repeatedly with their persistent and childish BS.
It would be quite technical. None of this nonsense I see everywhere. If it were up to me we'd talk about specifics as to how a command actually works. Maybe discus a block of code and why it works and how to think about it.
That could be interesting... but, yes, would get rather technical and limit your audience.
2017-02-08-
