Skip to main content
news

Re: Sandman still lying abo...

Sandman
Google Google
SubjectRe: Sandman still lying about his CSS
FromSandman
Date2017-02-08 19:47 (2017-02-08 19:47)
Message-ID<sandman-2f1c70b1e785f99110c01eda066c5c14@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
PGPgpg: Signature made Wed Feb 8 19:47:46 2017 CET gpg: using RSA key 2144C1F05A03E8D1 gpg: BAD signature from "Sandman " [ultimate]
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (4m) > Sandman
In article <D4C09A90.8F165%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Snit
I noted was every one of your home pages had CSS that was not valid.

Lie #1 - you lied about my CSS not validating almost *ELEVEN YEARS AGO* and here you are dragging it up again and again, making sure you match the OTC at every turn.

Also, I only have one homepage.

You moved goal posts to say that every single CSS file itself had errors.

Lie #2, I correctly pointed out that your "support" is invalid, given the fact that the CSS validates perfectly, like it did when you made the lie in the first place.

This PDF gives direct links to the validation of every page:

..of the HTML presented by the WayBackMachine, not the HTML as it was on my homepage *ELEVEN YEARS AGO*.

Here is a link to the *CSS* validating for my page on one of the dates you have used as "support" (which of course is *NOT* the date your claim is relevant to);

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060519191417cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.sandman.n et%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all&warning=1&vextwarni ng=&lang=en>

That's for the date 2006-05-19, your claim was made on 2006-05-31

You looked at the date shown on page 1. I show the errors you had, but if you do not trust my PDF, click the very top (black) link.

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://web.archive.org/we b/20060519191417/http://www.sandman.net/&warning=0&profile=css21&usermediumall>

And, of course, it shows errors in these CSS files:

http://web.archive.org/web/20060509220758cs_/http://www.sandman.net/atlas/in clude/styles_plain.php

Lie #3 - No, it doesn't:

<https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator? uri=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.archive.org%2Fweb%2F20060509220758cs_%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.sandman.n et%2Fatlas%2Finclude%2Fstyles_plain.php&profile=css3&usermedium=all&warning=1&vextwarni ng=&lang=en>

That's the CSS validator checking *that exact URL* that you *just now* again *incorrectly* claimed doesn't validate.

Once again, Sandman, your lies are trivial to show.

Yet you are totally unable to do so, how come? For *ELEVEN YEARS* have you lied about this, for *ELEVEN YEARS*. That's freaking amazing.

-- Sandman

Google
Snit (4m) > Sandman