Subject | Re: Snipped, unread, as usual. |
From | Snit |
Date | 2013-09-29 20:36 (2013-09-29 11:36) |
Message-ID | <CE6DC140.224BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Alan Baker |
Alan BakerAs I said elsewhere, if he had said: "Wait, you now claim to not be able to afford A but before you said you had an X, a Y, and a Z" that would be different than just mocking him for not having much money. No class at all on Sandman's part.
In article <CE6DBCDA.224B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:SnitAlan Baker
On 9/29/13 11:01 AM, in article mr-8352E0.20011629092013@News.Individual.NET, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net> wrote:SandmanSnit
In article <l29h99$dmc$2@dont-email.me>, Nashton <nonna@nana.ca>wrote:SandmanHahahaha, you guys are so poor you can't afford to buy your wife a newer model iPhone when she discarded the piece of shit Nokia you forced on her.Nashton
Yes, we are very poor. What's it to you?
I'm making fun of you after all these years where you've been trying to brag about your possessions, lie boy.
Bottom line is you mocked someone for your view of their socioeconomic status. Rather despicable of you.
No, Snit. He didn't mock anyone for their socioeconomic status.
He mocked Nicolas for his HYPOCRISY and lies.