Skip to main content
news

Re: Snipped, unread, as usual.

Snit
SubjectRe: Snipped, unread, as usual.
FromSnit
Date2013-09-29 20:36 (2013-09-29 11:36)
Message-ID<CE6DC140.224BC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsAlan Baker

On 9/29/13 11:25 AM, in article alangbaker-DFD8A6.11254629092013@news.shawcable.net, "Alan Baker" <alangbaker@telus.net>wrote:

Alan Baker
In article <CE6DBCDA.224B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:

Snit
On 9/29/13 11:01 AM, in article mr-8352E0.20011629092013@News.Individual.NET, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net> wrote:

Sandman
In article <l29h99$dmc$2@dont-email.me>, Nashton <nonna@nana.ca>wrote:

Hahahaha, you guys are so poor you can't afford to buy your wife a newer model iPhone when she discarded the piece of shit Nokia you forced on her.

Nashton
Yes, we are very poor. What's it to you?

Sandman
I'm making fun of you after all these years where you've been trying to brag about your possessions, lie boy.

Snit
Bottom line is you mocked someone for your view of their socioeconomic status. Rather despicable of you.

Alan Baker
No, Snit. He didn't mock anyone for their socioeconomic status.

He mocked Nicolas for his HYPOCRISY and lies.

As I said elsewhere, if he had said: "Wait, you now claim to not be able to afford A but before you said you had an X, a Y, and a Z" that would be different than just mocking him for not having much money. No class at all on Sandman's part.

-- "It is often hard to persuade the developers of one component to do what improves the system as a whole rather than what will make their own component more useful and successful." -- Richard Stallman