Google| Subject | Re: Snipped, unread, as usual. |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 2013-09-29 20:25 (2013-09-29 11:25) |
| Message-ID | <alangbaker-DFD8A6.11254629092013@news.shawcable.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (10m) |
In article <CE6DBCDA.224B2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
SnitNo, Snit. He didn't mock anyone for their socioeconomic status.
On 9/29/13 11:01 AM, in article mr-8352E0.20011629092013@News.Individual.NET, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net> wrote:SandmanSnit
In article <l29h99$dmc$2@dont-email.me>, Nashton <nonna@nana.ca>wrote:SandmanHahahaha, you guys are so poor you can't afford to buy your wife a newer model iPhone when she discarded the piece of shit Nokia you forced on her.Nashton
Yes, we are very poor. What's it to you?
I'm making fun of you after all these years where you've been trying to brag about your possessions, lie boy.
Bottom line is you mocked someone for your view of their socioeconomic status. Rather despicable of you.
He mocked Nicolas for his HYPOCRISY and lies.
Now if you had spoken of how you find it hard to believe he was not wealthy given his claims of X, Y, and Z that would be different... but you chose the low road.-- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
2013-09-29
