ed
On Sunday, March 25, 2012 2:26:31 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:

-hh
On Mar 25, 3:39?pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:

ed
On Saturday, March 24, 2012 8:15:04 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:

-hh
On Mar 24, 10:28?pm, Nashton <n...@na.ca>wrote:

Nashton
On 12-03-24 3:23 PM, -hh wrote:

-hh
On Mar 24, 12:03 pm, Nashton<n...@na.ca>?wrote:

Nashton
On 12-03-24 10:31 AM, -hh wrote:

-hh
On Mar 24, 6:17 am, Nashton<n...@na.ca>? ?wrote:

Nashton
On 12-03-23 5:43 AM, AD wrote:

AD
Fun to see suv driver's faces when you roar past them in a low displacement 4 pot compact :^]

Nashton
They wouldn't be roaring past me in my SUV ;)

-hh
SUV? ?Well, there's YA sign of overcompensation.

ed
...

-hh
I can recall my SUV days...

ed
...

-hh
An unfounded opinion based on no data. ?It was a Suburban with optional engine upgrade, optional fuel tank, towing package, etc. ?It outclassed the Toyota of its day in every category...well, except for fuel pump reliability :-)

ed
so you were saying something about suv's and overcompensation but you had one with the engine upgrade, tow package... ?something you trying to admit there... ? ?:)

-hh
Its called "right tool for the job", and when the job went away, so did that class of vehicle.

ed
Of course - everyone else is overcompensating but you, you were just being smart. ;D