Subject | Re: Laguna Seca is booked! |
From | ed |
Date | 2012-03-26 01:24 (2012-03-25 16:24) |
Message-ID | <11271714.1050.1332717880322.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | -hh |
Followups | Alan Baker (19m) > ed Nashton (11h & 38m) |
-hhw
On Mar 25, 3:39=A0pm, ed <n...@atwistedweb.com>wrote:ed
On Saturday, March 24, 2012 8:15:04 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:On Mar 24, 10:28=A0pm, Nashton <n...@na.ca>wrote:Nashton
On 12-03-24 3:23 PM, -hh wrote:On Mar 24, 12:03 pm, Nashton<n...@na.ca>=A0wrote:On 12-03-24 10:31 AM, -hh wrote:On Mar 24, 6:17 am, Nashton<n...@na.ca>=A0 =A0wrote:On 12-03-23 5:43 AM, AD wrote:Fun to see suv driver's faces when you roar past them in a lo=
Itdisplacement 4 pot compact :^]They wouldn't be roaring past me in my SUV ;)edSUV? =A0Well, there's YA sign of overcompensation.
......I can recall my SUV days...An unfounded opinion based on no data. =A0It was a Suburban with optional engine upgrade, optional fuel tank, towing package, etc. =A0=
Of course - everyone else is overcompensating but you, you were just being= smart. ;D-hhoutclassed the Toyota of its day in every category...well, except for fuel pump reliability :-)so you were saying something about suv's and overcompensation but you had one with the engine upgrade, tow package... =A0something you trying to admit there... =A0 =A0:)
=20 Its called "right tool for the job", and when the job went away, so did that class of vehicle.